The Chair of the Committee on Ukraine's Integration into the EU took part
in the panel discussion ‘Development of inter-party cooperation to
strengthen democratic stability’ of the Summit for Democracy 2023, which
took place in Washington.
Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze thanked the countries of the free world that
chose the side of good, protecting Ukraine: ‘For the first time in
history, we feel that we are not alone. But our struggle is not over yet’.
The Chair of the Committee on Ukraine’s integration into the EU reminded
that the war started not a year, but eight years ago. In her opinion, the
international community has made several mistakes and missed many alarms
that required response to avert this brutal and barbaric full-scale war.
At the same time, Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze noted that Ukraine has united
during the full-scale war. Members of the Parliament also demonstrated
their unity. ‘When the Russian troops were standing around Kyiv, we were
quite a serious target for the enemy, having gathered all in one building.
But we were happy to do it. We all gathered as a constitutional majority
of the Parliament. It was surprising to many that we did not run away, did
not look for a safer place for ourselves and our families. We were there
to serve our country. We were happy to see each other and, despite our
fierce disputes, make decisions that had no political basis, but were
aimed at protecting our people’, said the Chair of the Committee.
According to her, the voting of the Parliament was based on consensus: ‘We
have seen this unity in the face of an existential threat, when the
country’s existence was jeopardised. We worked in a completely unique
atmosphere’.
Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze emphasised that the Parliament managed to
maintain unity in the most difficult time: ‘To protect our independence,
our right to choose our path after the victory, which we hope we will
achieve with your help. And here, of course, we need even more weapons,
even more sanctions pressure on Russia, prosecution of those guilty of war
crimes, as well as financial and humanitarian aid. And we all talk about
it in unison. As well as about our European and Euro-Atlantic
integration’.
However, according to the Chair of the Committee, there are discussions
and different approaches to the democratic system during martial law. ‘Of
course, martial law limits publicity, the active participation of all
stakeholders in political life, as well as access to information.
Unfortunately, for security reasons, the Parliament neither informs about
plenary sessions in advance, nor invites journalists or makes live
broadcasts. We can inform the society about the decisions only after we
leave the Parliament building. Thus, voters sometimes lack information
about activities of the Parliament. And the Parliament may be blamed for
the Government's decisions. The main reason for it is that the Parliament
is not represented publicly to the level to which it should be
represented’, Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze said.
She also emphasised that Ukraine now has a unique situation when the
majority forms a coalition by itself. ‘In view of lacking clearly
prescribed rules of interaction between the majority and the minority,
lacking political traditions and political culture, which requires
compliance with procedures and the involvement of the opposition,
additional temptations are created, which are very risky’, the Chair
said. She is convinced that in any parliament the majority should
take a responsible approach to the dialogue with the opposition to
maintain the system of checks and balances. ‘I was in the previous
convocation of the Parliament and in the Government. I was on both sides.
Therefore, I am convinced that it is the majority's responsibility to
honestly approach the dialogue with the opposition and it should be ready
for it’, said Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze.